Skip to Content

UFO Protocols

Establishing standards for detection, verification, reporting, and response

Introduction: Why protocols matter

As public, scientific, and government attention to UAP/UFOs grows, ad‑hoc reactions aren’t enough. Credibility depends on shared protocols: how we detect, verify, document, communicate, and—if warranted—respond to potential contact. Beyond witness testimony, protocols provide the discipline that turns isolated events into actionable knowledge.

A recent effort led by the University of St Andrews’ SETI Detection Hub aims to modernize post‑detection procedures for potential extraterrestrial communication—the first significant update in decades—highlighting how unprepared institutions remain and why coherent frameworks are urgently needed Live Science.

This page presents a comprehensive protocol stack for the UFO Timeline Project community—bridging citizen science, academic standards, and international considerations.

1) Scope and definitions

  • UFO/UAP: Any aerial or transmedium phenomenon not identified after investigation.
  • Post‑detection: Procedures that begin once a potential signal/event is flagged as anomalous but before confirmation.
  • Contact: Any credible indication of non‑human intelligence (NHI), including signals, artifacts, or close encounters.

2) Existing frameworks and gaps

  • 1989 SETI post‑detection guidelines: Emphasize transparency and scientific sharing, advise coordination with intergovernmental bodies. They are high‑level and dated, with limited operational detail.
  • St Andrews SETI Detection Hub (2022–): Working to craft modern, cross‑disciplinary protocols for detection, interpretation, impact assessment, and response pathways (policy + science) Live Science.

Gaps these efforts highlight:

  • Operational steps for multi‑sensor verification
  • Chain‑of‑custody standards for physical evidence
  • Health/safety and biosecurity considerations
  • Misinformation and public communication management
  • Governance, consent, and ethics in potential contact scenarios

3) Principles that guide all protocols

  • Scientific integrity: Prioritize falsifiability, controls, and reproducibility.
  • Safety first: Physical, radiological, biological, and psychological safety are paramount.
  • Proportionality: Scale response to evidence quality; avoid overreach on weak data.
  • Transparency with responsibility: Share data promptly, protect privacy and sensitive locations.
  • Non‑provocation: No transmissions or engagement that could reasonably escalate risk without an agreed mandate (see METI vs. SETI below).
  • International coordination: Use interoperable formats and neutral venues for collaboration.

4) Detection and verification protocol

A. Initial detection

  • Log when/where/how: precise time, GPS, instrument settings, environmental conditions.
  • Sensor triage: Attempt immediate multi‑modal observation (optical, thermal, RF, EMF, radiation).
  • Preserve raw data: Keep originals; create hashes; document every copy and transformation.

B. Rapid conventional elimination

  • Cross‑check ADS‑B/flight data, NOTAMs, satellite trackers, astronomical ephemerides, drone databases, meteor/fireball networks, weather radar, and Starlink trains.
  • Apply parallax, angular velocity, and lens flare checks; review camera EXIF and timing drift.

C. Independent replication

  • Seek independent observers (teams or fixed stations) to confirm from separate vantage points.
  • Require at least two corroborating data streams (e.g., visual+thermal, visual+RF).

D. Escalation tiers (provisional classification)

  • Tier 0: Explained (conventional)
  • Tier 1: Unresolved (insufficient data)
  • Tier 2: Anomalous (multi‑sensor, still unexplained)
  • Tier 3: High‑significance anomaly (multi‑witness, multi‑sensor, robust controls)
  • Tier 4: Contact‑relevant (information‑bearing signal, apparent intelligence, or direct interaction)

5) Evidence handling and chain of custody

  • Digital evidence

    • Save originals immediately; compute checksums (e.g., SHA‑256); record device IDs/firmware.
    • Maintain a read‑only master copy; analyze only duplicates; document every processing step.

  • Physical trace evidence

    • Use PPE; photograph in situ with scale and GPS; log ambient readings (EMF, radiation, temperature, magnetic).
    • Store samples in sterile, appropriate containers (e.g., foil for metallics; glass for volatiles; Faraday bags for electronics).
    • Maintain a chain‑of‑custody ledger: who, when, where, why each transfer occurred.

6) Health, safety, and biosecurity

  • Site control: Establish perimeters; avoid touching unknown materials.
  • Exposure management: If EM/radiation spikes, retreat; log exposure times; seek medical evaluation for symptoms (burns, dizziness, tinnitus).
  • Biosecurity: Treat biological unknowns as potentially hazardous; no home storage; consult certified labs for analysis.
  • Psychological well‑being: Provide witness support; avoid coercive interviews; respect anonymity when requested.

7) Reporting and data standards

  • Minimum incident report fields

    • Time (UTC & local), GPS, environmental and astronomical conditions
    • Witness roster and independent accounts
    • Object description (shape, kinematics, luminosity, sound), duration
    • Instrumentation used and settings
    • All effects (EM, biological, animal reactions)
    • Attach raw files, calibration files, and processing notes

  • Formats and repositories

    • Use open formats where possible (CSV, FITS, uncompressed video); include metadata.
    • Submit to recognized repositories and networks (e.g., academic partners, citizen science databases) with privacy safeguards.

Note: Your site already offers the Investigator’s Pack PDFs (Field Kit Checklist, Field Report Template, Field Investigation Guide) to standardize fieldwork documentation.

8) Communication and media

  • Misinformation risk management

    • Avoid premature claims; label status clearly (provisional, under review).
    • Publish methods and uncertainties; invite external audit.

  • Privacy and consent

    • Obtain written consent for publishing witness names, faces, or exact home locations.

  • Public updates

    • Share summaries promptly; release raw data when safe; embargo only for safety or privacy.

9) Governance, ethics, and law

  • Legal compliance: Airspace, lasers, drones, RF monitoring, trespass, cultural/tribal sites, environmental protections.
  • Ethics review: For any invasive sampling, medical tests, or high‑risk actions, seek institutional or community ethics review.
  • Intellectual property and openness: Default to open data while protecting sensitive details (e.g., endangered sites, personal data).

10) METI vs. SETI: To transmit or not?

  • SETI (listen only): Lower risk, widely supported as a default stance.
  • METI (Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence): Higher risk; requires broad, democratic, international consensus before any intentional transmission or signaling escalation.
  • Recommended stance: No unilateral transmissions or gestures that could be interpreted as strategic signaling without intergovernmental mandate.

Reference: The St Andrews SETI Detection Hub is explicitly working on policy‑level post‑detection and response frameworks to address these societal/governance questions Live Science.

11) International coordination

  • Engage neutral, international fora (e.g., scientific unions, space law and COPUOS‑adjacent communities) for standards alignment.
  • Promote interoperable data schemas and shared calibration protocols across nations, agencies, and citizen networks.
  • Encourage independent replication by geographically distributed stations.

12) Special protocols for contact‑relevant scenarios (Tier 4)

  • Information‑bearing signal

    • Multi‑observatory confirmation; verify non‑terrestrial origin (e.g., Doppler, dispersion); rule out spoofing.
    • Freeze raw streams; form an independent verification panel; publish methods and preliminary results.
    • Brief relevant international bodies; prepare public Q&A emphasizing uncertainties and next steps.

  • Apparent intelligence in‑situ (craft/being)

    • Non‑provocation: Observe, record, do not approach; prioritize safety.
    • Notify authorities via predefined channels; preserve scene integrity; maintain full logs.
    • Psychological care for witnesses; long‑term follow‑up with informed consent.

13) Citizen field SOPs (quick reference)

  • Before: Check weather/astronomy, charge gear, pack PPE and first aid; review the Field Kit Checklist.
  • During: Use tripod; film wide with context; switch to telephoto only after securing establishing shots; capture thermal if available; log everything.
  • After: Fill the Field Report Template; preserve raw files; submit to a trusted repository; be transparent about uncertainties.

14) Roadmap for the UFO Timeline Project

  • Short‑term

    • Publish and maintain downloadable Investigator’s Pack PDFs.
    • Launch a standardized submission portal with required metadata fields and file types.
    • Offer a public “methods” page with our verification and tiering criteria.

  • Mid‑term

    • Build partnerships with university labs for materials analysis.
    • Deploy fixed monitoring nodes (all‑sky + RF + EM) at selected hotspots; adopt shared calibration routines.

  • Long‑term

    • Contribute to international protocol harmonization—align our practices with emerging standards from cross‑disciplinary groups, including efforts like the St Andrews SETI Detection Hub.

Recommended reading and context

Closing thoughts

Protocols transform mystery into method. They safeguard people and data, enable collaboration, and prepare society for outcomes from the ordinary to the extraordinary. Whether we’re dealing with misidentified drones, unknown physics, or genuine contact, a disciplined framework ensures that what we learn is reliable—and shareable with the world.

UFO / UAP Protocols – Quick Reference PDF

Download our quick reference guide.

Download